The Earned Schedule Exchange


January 31, 2024
The Coconut and the Guava: How Not to Plan a Sprint

“Humans s**k at estimating in absolute terms but are much better estimating in relative terms.” *

Coarsely put, but a ubiquitous opinion in the Agile community. What’s the evidence for the claim?

Even the Agile Alliance admits it’s weak: “…there is a persistent claim in the Agile community that research in the psychology of planning shows that people fare better at relative than absolute estimation; in fact, the grounding for this claim is at best, tentative.”*

For proof, we’re left with anecdotes. Supposedly, they show how easy and reliable it is to estimate by comparing objects of similar size.

My favorite “proof”: the coconut and the guava. The author claims that it’s easy to use a guava as a reference and say that the coconut is about four times bigger.*

Huh? Many of us from the “high north” don’t find it so easy. Coconuts, yes; but guavas? Four times? Not so much. It’s not like we see them every trip to the 7-Eleven.

Relative estimates require common background knowledge.

That’s a slippery slope. It express beliefs about size. Whatever immediate access I might have to my belief about size, I don’t have the same access to your belief. Do we mean the same thing when we say that a coconut is four times bigger than a guava?

Maybe I’m thinking of volume rather than diameter. To me, the coconut would be 64 times the size of a guava. Or, perhaps you’re thinking of surface area, in which case the difference would be 16 times.

A dialogue might eventually disambiguate the comparison, but the process is not as straight-forward as portrayed. This is especially true when the object is more abstract than a coconut, for instance a user story.

Want to plan your next sprint? Avoid the pitfalls of relative estimates. Rely instead on absolute numbers such as Earned Schedule’s duration estimate.

It’s an absolute number based on absolute numbers. It uses current performance to estimate finish date. And, it can be compared to allowances for uncertainty—again, specific numbers.

Is it better for planning your next sprint? Absolutely!

 * For references, see below. Follow ProjectFlightDeck on LinkedIn. For videos on how to use Earned Schedule, see EarnedScheduleAcademy on YouTube. And, when you’re ready, sign up for ProjectFlightDeck Express.

References:

http://chase-seibert.github.io/blog/2016/05/13/agile-points-vs-hours.html

https://www.agilealliance.org/glossary/relative-estimation/#q=~(filters~(postType~(~'page~'post~'aa_book~'aa_event_session~'aa_experience_report~'aa_glossary~'aa_research_paper~'aa_video)~tags~(~'relative*20estimation))~searchTerm~'~sort~false~sortDirection~'asc~page~1)

Add new comment

All fields are required.

*

*

*

No Comments


January 15, 2024
A.I. vs. H.I.

 

It’ll take time to sort out the best way to use Artificial Intelligence for schedule management. In the meantime, why not use a technique that was sorted out decades ago?

Earned Schedule was first published by Walt Lipke in 2003. It offers superior measures of past performance and future duration, as shown by simulation studies, empirical research, and statistical analysis.*

More relevant for those of us with boots on the ground, ES works. I’ve used it successfully on projects and programs, large and small.

Plus, there’s freeware and commercial software that act as accelerators and force multipliers. The tools have also stood the test of time. I first introduced ProjectFlightDeck products in 2007.

Even though I’m a vendor, l believe that it’s not just whiz-bang tools that make the difference. They’re great for outputting numbers, but it’s Human Intelligence that transforms output into action. Long live H.I.

What do you think?

* For videos on how to use Earned Schedule, see my YouTube channel, EarnedScheduleAcademy. And, when you’re ready, sign up for ProjectFlightDeck Express.

References:

Crumrine, Capt Kevin (USAF) & Lt. Col. J. D. Ritschel, PhD. “A Comparison of Earned Value Management and Earned Schedule as Schedule Predictors on DoD ACAT I ProgramsThe Measurable News, 2013 Issue 2

Lipke, Walt. “Further Study of the Normality of CPI and SPI(t),” PM World Today, October 2011

Vanhoucke M., S. Vandevoorde. “A Simulation and Evaluation of Earned Value Metrics to Forecast Project Duration" Journal of the Operations Research Society, Volume 58: 1361 - 1374, Issue 10 (October 2007) (Note – the article is made available on-line at a cost of $10 using the following URL: www.palgrave-journals.com.)

Add new comment

All fields are required.

*

*

*

No Comments




Archives